"Is it always to be a winners-losers world, or can we keep everyone in the game? Do we still have what it takes to find a better way?" - Robert Fulghum
In our psychology class we often refer to the idea of cognitive dissonance. When we hold two beliefs or thoughts in our mind that disagree with each other we experience a sort of tension or discomfort, and our minds take measures to settle this discrepancy. For example, I often feel guilty when I throw away uneaten food, knowing that my waste would feed a hungry mouth. Or when I believe that making healthier choices will benefit me immeasurably and catch myself scarfing down a bag of potato chips.
Our minds are meant to make sense of the world, and when things are in disagreement it means we haven't quite figured everything out. It's really quite unsettling, and is dealt with quickly by dismissing one of the thoughts/feelings/actions in disagreement and subsequently rationalizing our answers ("I know that eating junk food is in disagreement with my desire to live better, but I've worked so hard this week. I deserve this salty snack. Besides, it's just this once.")
The original proponent of Cognitive Dissonance Theory was Leon Festinger. He suggested that our minds are motivated toward a harmony of ideas and beliefs, or at least away from disharmony. Peace of mind.
Not only do we attempt to harmonize internally, but socially as well. We strive to fit in, to be part of a group and share perspectives. We enjoy being around those similar to ourselves. But perhaps we get a little too used to an inherited worldview, reinforced by surrounding ourselves in a community of those who share it. So much so, that we have a hard time seeing things any other way. We may internalize the assumption that there is only ONE RIGHT WAY to see the world, and begin to view differences as a threats.
This would be okay if it ended here.
Unfortunately the way we often deal with threats is by squashing them, instead of examining our own fears. We rationalize so much of opponent-squashing behaviour in the name of a right cause. It doesn't occur to us that we might be wrong, because our ways have always worked for us. Whoever Us is. Under this view differing opinions and their owners are obstacles to our interpretation of the greater good, and somehow we are more comfortable justifying wars and violence than we are of admitting to our own human fallibility.
Our culture of violence is growing steadily as we gain more and more capacity to connect with multitudes around the world, rapidly increasing our exposure to different, and possibly disagreeing, attitudes and beliefs. Arguably, the pace of this exposure is unprecedented, and somewhat ironically we must learn to grow accustomed to change.
Disagreement itself is inevitable, given the vast and unimaginable scope of human experiences. We can learn to accept this, but when our communities of self-fulfilling prophecies lead us to believe that others are wrong, we become defensive, self-interested, clutching our righteous inherited worldviews. And it's very dangerous when people begin to tell you "you're wrong because you're different."
Some people may have seen this video already. It is disturbing, and of course fascinating. And perhaps most important of all, it is telling of our increasingly violent behaviour on the basis of selfishness and entitlement. Perhaps we have grown too used to valuing our own interests, and devaluing others'.
Social harmony does not mean total agreement of beliefs. Indeed, that would be impossible. It does, however, mean not squashing others. Harmony is about co-existence, and getting used to the idea that we haven't got all the answers, if any of the answers, and that everyone's answer is worth listening to, for it might contain something we'd not considered before.
As my Mom said once to my siblings and I on our way to a visit with people we weren't particularly fond of as youth: "You don't have to like each other, you just have to get along."
Thank you for reading.
Yours in peace,
Brandon
P.S. When I watched the video above, I had to catch myself making character judgments of the store patrons. After all, in a similar situation I might behave just the same. Our problems are systematic, and somehow we're all a part of the same team.